Parts of the following is taken from "The Neo-Tech Discovery" by Dr Frank R. Wallace (Senior Research Scientist and future Nobel Prize winner). Published by I&O Publishing

People who choose destructive "careers" (such as politicians) experience continuously decreasing self-esteems along with a diminishing capacity for happiness and pleasures. They harm both their own and every other person’s life. They are destructive, silly, immature and childish. By choosing to evade reality they undermine their ability to think clearly, to produce values, to live happily and to compete honestly to survive. As a result, they increasingly transfer responsibilities for their failures onto others. They routinely lay blame and guilt on others for their own problems.

They design their illusions to make themselves appear as innocent benefactors, and their victims appear as the guilty malefactors. In actual fact the opposite is true. But as long as people allow themselves to accept those inversions of honesty, those parasites will keep on pillaging them and society. By choosing to expropriate rather than earn values, those agents of force destroy their own lives by demolishing their competence, self-esteem and happiness.

Every person does however have the capacity to change and become an honest, strong, productive individual that is able to achieve growing prosperity and happiness:

 Think rationally, logically, objectively.

 Focus on reality.

 Seek facts in full context.

 Organise self, life and work toward profitable actions.

 Ask clear questions and listen carefully.

 Value time. Use it efficiently and profitably.

 Anticipate, and then strive for achievement.

 Try to understand fully and contextually before judging.

 Show passion, benevolence and innocence toward life.

 Avoid acting on feelings. Good action produces good feelings.

Words and speeches can be crafted together to make evil actions sound good. Politicians have this art off to perfection. In fact their livelihoods rely on it. Their livelihoods also depend on keeping everyone from knowing, and being able to judge the parasitic behaviour and destruction that they inflict on their fellow human beings and society.

Evil: any action, which brings physical, intellectual, or emotional harm to another human being.

"DO NOT JUDGE OTHERS" is a theme which is consistently put up by "so-called" intellectuals and theologians in order to sustain their way of life. They have a vested interest in keeping the non-judgemental way of thinking alive.

The ability to make moral judgements is necessary to make good decisions and function properly. The more important the decision, the more important it is to make an accurate moral judgement. Whether it is business or pleasure, it is crucial to make a correct judgement.

Keep your mind open to new information and be prepared to correct errors, especially those that are based on inaccurate or incomplete information. In this way the damage done by judgementally error is minimised. You are always responsible for your own actions and must bear the consequences, although purposeful errors, carry more severe consequences than innocent errors.

Forget judgements made by others. Do your own thinking ; make your own judgements.

Morals are not created by or determined by anyone. No one can deem what is moral and what is not. The same standards exist for everyone, in all cultures, ages and locality. They are independent of anyone’s opinion. The two and only two standards are:

 Any chosen action that benefits human beings or society is morally good

 Any chosen action that harms human beings is morally bad.

Feelings and emotions cannot be considered as standards or morals. A person’s lifestyle, desires, and preferences can vary without altering a person’s character and without making a person morally right or wrong. But moral absolutes exist and following or violating moral absolutes determines a person’s character and self-esteem.

 Objective morals are based on reality, reason and logic.

 Subjective "morals" are based on unreal feelings and wishes.

All unreal (subjective) morals require force, deception, or coercion to impose them on others.

Existentialism, and "do your own thing" attitudes are attempts to deny objective morals by implying that everything is of equal value and no standards exist.

To follow this to its irrational end means that no one has to EARN love, value or worth. A person you love; child , wife, husband, lover, should have no more love and adulation than a beggar, Hitler, or a Charles Manson. They all should be valued and loved equally. In other words all human beings, regardless of their beneficial nature and character, should be diminished until they are equal in value to the lowest pieces of slime that inhabit this world. That same, unjust theme is promoted repeatedly in the Bible. The theme that one should love all living entities equally means, a persons love for one’s loved one’s should never exceed the love that a person gives to a stranger, tree, a blade of grass, weeds, or pebbles on the beach. This is the meaning promoted by the Bible, and other followers of egalitarianism and altruism.

Today’s "ecologists" and "environmentalists" use the force of the government to place the well being of birds, insects, trees, plants, and inanimate landscapes above the lives and well-being and happiness of human beings. Those anti-human themes are based on a altruistic* philosophy advanced by such books as the Bible and others. Many people believe that altruism means kindness, benevolence, or respect for the rights of others. But it means the exact opposite: it teaches self-sacrifice, as well as the sacrifice of others, to any unspecified "public need". It regards man as a sacrificial animal.

*Altruism (dictionary definition) uncalculated consideration of, regard for, or devotion to others interests sometimes in accordance with an ethical principle.

The Media’s Distorted Connotation — A benevolent life-style based on selfless sacrifice that reflects love and concern for one’s fellow man and his needs. Altruism through self-sacrifice is the ultimate ethical good.

The Real Meaning — The philosophy where sacrifices of human values is the good. Sacrifice is a process of reducing greater values to lesser values. Altruism or sacrifice always yields a net loss for everyone. If carried out completely, altruism would destroy all human values and thus destroy all human life. Altruism reflects a malevolence and meanness toward all human beings in denying people the guiltless right to their own lives and property and happiness. Reflects an envious fear and resentment for the pleasures earned by those capable of living productive and competitive lives.

Constant exposure to ever-increasing atrocities of altruism and egalitarianism gradually numbs people into accepting higher and higher levels of injustice, human suffering, killing, violence, and acts of terrorism. Fewer and fewer people object to or even care about the mounting atrocities. As those people who consistently upheld individual rights to life and property fade away the conditions will develop for the ultimate egalitarian result: a world-wide Leninist-style or religious-style slaughterhouse. After all you can commit any kind of atrocity, if you believe you are going to go a better place and get forgiveness from some super-being called God. The final purification is always the mass liquidation of human life.

 Rejecting the initiation of force, threat of force, coercion, or fraud against any individual for any reason whatsoever is the foundation of morality — MORAL

 The use of force, ("ends justifying the means" attitude) especially government force, is acceptable against individuals, particularly if the result serves the social good or higher cause is — IMMORAL.

In regards to force, the end can never justify the means. All moral actions are based on the principles that prohibit force, threat of force, coercion, and fraud as a means to an end. No matter how noble it may appear.

The majority of average, honest people will follow authority to carry out destructive, immoral acts to the point of injuring, even killing people. They become agents of destruction even when it is clear that their actions are incompatible with the standards of morality. Very few people are heroic enough to resist authority. External authority will always develop into a destructive machine when people on face value, or out of fear, obey and follow the commands and wishes of the authority in power. In fact, to break the habit of destructive obedience to authority, all you need to say is,.....NO.

All destructive authorities become powerless if civilians withdraw their support and say no. The oppressor does not have any power over you except that which you give him. Only through co-operation can he carry out his destructive acts. Hitler himself did not kill thousands of human beings; ordinary civilians acting obediently did.

Most Germans and others were duped into admiring Hitler’s god-like courage as one of the bravest soldiers in World War I. Most Germans and others blinded themselves to the obvious fact that this popular, glory-talking human was nothing more than a criminal destroyer of values and a mass-murderer. Like most politicians, Hitler committed acts of destruction so he could feel big, important and powerful, thus protecting his parasitic livelihood.

Given the chance, any politician from a small-town councillor to a president or prime minister would seize Hitlerian power with all its destructiveness. This is the essence of all politicians. It’s just a question of the levels and degrees to which they are allowed to carry out their acts.

Under a camouflaged deception, they plunder and destroy people, property, jobs and whatever else gets in the way, in order to advance their own careers, glory and power. The destruction caused by politicians is far greater and more dangerous than the acts committed by criminal- minded gangsters. Most political leaders are nothing more than camouflaged criminal-minded plunderers committing legalised "crimes" to garner unearned livelihoods, power and glory.

They justify in their own minds the following criteria: all human beings are by nature evil, irrational, and destructive. Human beings must be controlled by a "higher authority" or government and be forced to serve others or society.

The truth is: human beings are by nature good, rational, and productive. If they weren’t, mankind could not exist. By being free to act according to their own nature, they will best serve themselves and society, without force or coercion from any authority or government.

'People build and governments destroy. This is the way it has always been'

Who really needs government?

Every act of government falls under one of two purposes:

1) Public protection.

2) Public "well-being".

Every act of BIG government falls under purpose #2. All "social programs" wear the disguise of public "well-being" but are all really big-government tools to regulate the economy.

And all "regulatory bureaucracies" also wear the disguise of public well-being but are all big-government tools to regulate industries.

Public protection, on the other hand, is a valid purpose of government.

However, do not confuse "regulatory bureaucracies" with "public protection."

Regulatory bureaucracies are BIG government - nothing more.

The government’s role in public protection can be objective, and not a bureaucratic-building hoax, by defining the indivisible, unconditional act of protection: Protecting the individual from initiatory force.

Big government has found conditions and ways to offer and divide up so-called "protection" by building huge self - defeating regulatory bureaucracies that haunt us now. By understanding the government’s specific role of protection, which is a super efficient local police protection and a super efficient national defence. That’s it. Everything else must go - big government must go.

The underprivileged class today exists for two reasons:

1) The economy offers us a fraction of the wealth we could all enjoy (because of government regulations)

2) big government and its messenger, the media, survive via an underprivileged class. You see, only through an underprivileged class can big government build a big welfare state. Big government needs a big welfare state to regulate the economy. Indeed, a big underprivileged class is big business for big government.

Governments always deplete everyone’s earnings and life. They survive by continually expanding their power and increasingly transferring the earnings of 'workers' to 'non-workers.'

They cleverly finagle respect and adulation for their destruction by using good catchwords like "compassion" "the heart" "humanitarianism" "human rights". They never mention the valid points such as individual rights and competitive production. To survive psychologically, politicians must garner praise for their thieving destructive acts. By using the handy, "goodness" gimmicks to make their destructive actions seem "good" "compassionate" and "humane" they can hide the criminality of their actions. They can easily garner support by using the media, academics, and religious collaborators who all have an active role to play in keeping the hoax alive. All politicians, religious leaders, academics and members of the media destroy the personal property and individual rights of others through their escalating seizure of earned wealth from the producers.

They will eventually dissipate all productive wealth and individual freedom, which in turn will cause a world-wide economic collapse and all that entails. These are the perfect settings for a global nuclear war.

When a ruler exhausts his own country’s economy, he attacks his neighbours. It is his only means of postponing internal collapse and prolonging his rule. A country that violates the rights of its own citizens, will not respect the rights of its neighbours. Those who do not recognise individual rights, will not recognise the rights of nations: a nation is only a number of individuals.

Private citizens (whether rich or poor, businessmen or workers) have no power to start a war. That power is the exclusive prerogative of a government.

Which type of government is more likely to plunge a country into war: a government of limited powers, bound by constitutional restrictions — or an unlimited government, open to the pressure of any group with war-like interests or ideologies. A government able to command armies to march at the whim of a single chief executive?

Just as an individual has the right of self-defence, so has a free country if attacked. But this does not give its government the right to draft men into military service - which is a violation of a man’s right to his own life. A volunteer army is the most efficient army, as many military authorities have testified. A free country has never lacked volunteers when attacked by a foreign aggressor. Not many men would volunteer for ventures such as Korea or Vietnam, which were political foreign policies.

The notion that poverty breeds war is a myth. The question is; what breeds poverty? The answer is the degree of a country’s freedom. If the nations of the world are divided into the "haves" and the "have nots", it is the "haves" who have freedom and the "have nots" who don’t.

'So long as men hold the notion that the "individual" is sacrificial fodder for the "collective" or "tribe", and some men have the right to rule others by force, and that some (any) alleged good can justify it — there can be no peace within a nation and no peace among nations. If war is ever to be outlawed it is the use of force that has to be outlawed'

Laissez-faire capitalism is the only social system based on the recognition of individual rights and therefore the only system that bans force from social relationships. By the nature of its basic principles and interests , it is the only system fundamentally opposed to war.

Men who are free to produce, have no incentive to loot; they have nothing to gain from war and a great deal to lose. Ideologically, the principle of individual rights does not permit a man to seek his own livelihood at the point of a gun, inside or outside his country.

Economically, wars cost money; in a free economy, where wealth is privately owned, the costs of war comes out of the income of private citizens (there is no overblown public treasury to hide that fact) and a citizen cannot hope to recoup his own financial losses (such us taxes or business dislocations or property destruction) by winning the war. Thus his own economic interests are on the side of peace.

The trader and the warrior have been fundamental antagonists throughout history. Trade does not flourish on battlefields, factories do not produce under bombardments. Capitalism is a society of traders, and is denounced by every power hungry sub-human who regards trade as "selfish" and conquest as "noble."

Capitalism gave mankind the longest period of peace in history (a period during which there were no wars involving the entire civilised world) from the end of the Napoleonic wars in 1815 to the outbreak of World War 1 in 1914.

Most material achievements have been maligned and attacked by theologians, politicians and other professional parasites.. In fact their livelihoods are based on scorning human-produced goods and services and saddling these producers with guilt. Once saddled with guilt they are more easily manipulated, duped, and robbed of any power, property and money. To survive these professional parasites must constantly seize material and psychological gains from the producers of goods and services.

"The greatest value one can bring to a society is job creation."

Those professional, self-appointed, destructive enviers, create false inverted realities that pit the consumer against the so-called "villain": the producer. But these parasites always hurt both the consumer and the producer by promoting government controls and force. By contrast the "villain" producer has and always has been the only real benefactor and hero of mankind. Without producers of goods and services, no consumers would exist. In fact little, if any, human life would exist. The only people who would be gladdened by this scenario would be the altruist, the person who believes that all human beings are subordinate to society and higher causes.

"Altruism is a prime moral evil. No higher cause, or higher good exists other than man, the individual."

Adolph Hitler was a consummate altruist. He scorned material values. He was a person who abstained from worldly pleasures and comforts and was committed to "sacrifice". He demanded the eventual sacrifice of all human beings to his "higher cause" of duty and obedience to society. Like any politician he had to feed his weak ego and pseudo self-esteem with an ever-increasing need for power and control over others, by using force.

In order to maintain these illusions, they must continue attacking the producers, their thinking, their products, and their individual rights and property. They live physically and psychologically off the producers.

By being dependant on others for survival, non-productive parasites are unable to gain the self-esteem and competence needed to be happy. Also, by not earning their material rewards they have no genuine power.

'Productivity is the building block for prosperity and happiness'

Laziness is yielding to actions of least effort. But human beings cannot prosper or be happy through actions of least effort. Effort and logical reasoned choice are needed to survive. You must constantly choose to exert effort, think logically and act beyond your feelings to prosper. To achieve any lasting prosperity and happiness, you must constantly do things you don’t feel like doing.

Politicians, thieves, theologians, social intellectuals, many media people, most lawyers, most professors and all other professional destructive parasites make a choice to be dishonest, lazy and dependent on others for survival. Beneath the skin lies a lack of maturity, self-esteem, independence, self-responsibility, honesty and effort. They all hold various degrees of secret fear and envious hatred towards productive people. Their basic core is dishonest laziness. They default on the constant hard effort needed to produce tradable values.

To live as you are designed to, people must produce competitive goods and services that others desire and will voluntarily pay for.

 Would you pay for the services of a politician?

 Would you pay for the services of a refuse collector?

 A politician uses force and collects toll money for his unwanted service.

 A refuse collector provides a much needed service and gets paid for his work.

Essentially all politicians are lazy, despite their cleverly staged work-like flurries, which are nothing more than anti-productive ego-boosting power ploys. These are the daily routines of dictators, prime ministers, and presidents.

Would any free person voluntary pay for the "services" of a politician, a bureaucrat, a dictator, a theologian, or a social "intellectual"?

The only valid reason for a government’s existence is for the protection of the individual and property.

Freedom and property can be taken from an individual in two ways:

1) by his or her consent (moral),

2) by force, coercion, or fraud (immoral).

All governments throughout history have immorally seized individual freedom and property from their own citizens by force or the threat of force. It is always done under the heading of serving the common "good" or "higher" cause. They consistently deprive citizens of their property, prosperity, freedom and happiness.

No higher good exists in this universe than the individual human being. Nothing can be more important than your one and only life. Without the conscious life of individual human beings, existence would have no meaning.

Most governments throughout the world today are bankrupt, and are on a self-destructive path which is dragging humanity with it. To squeeze even more from the productive people they will invent ever more laws.

In the USA it is now impossible to set up any kind of business without breaking some law. The harm caused by this rapidly expanding parasitical-elite class is cannibalising that great country. Unless they get rid of that destructive entity, people that brought great innovations, like Henry Ford, will no longer be able to flourish.

Hitler targeted the Jews because they were the most productive Germans. By obliterating the individual, and using force backed Master -Servant ideals politicians can create a sea of "noble" lies, illusions, deceptions, doubts and uncertainties with which to hoodwink citizens into committing all kinds of atrocities onto their fellow citizens. Honesty, honour, justice, logic, robbery, perjury, cruelty, the horrible becoming humane and white becoming black can all happen for reasons of 'State.'

The end is always the mass destruction of human life. Those who will not surrender their lives and minds to others, and who produce the most values for others; they, as the best, are sacrificed and eliminated first.

Government Control.

On a morality scale most criminals are a few notches above the politician and theologian. The criminal does not attempt to establish himself as a morally righteous person or palm off his actions as morally good after stealing from others. Politicians and theologians use altruism or the God concept to foist guilt onto their victims in order to steal and usurp a livelihood from them.

Various dictators replace one mystical authority, God, with another authority called State. They are both equally destructive.

Stalin, Mao and their obnoxious colleagues used various altruistic, God-concept tools to justify slaughtering millions of innocent productive people, in the name of a higher "good", just to build false personal power and bogus jobs. Out of resentment and envy they wanted to drag everyone to the grave with them. Out of envy and hatred these people eventually destroy themselves and anyone else.

Stalin, Hitler and Mao were personally responsible for a vast amount of property destruction, while systematically slaughtering millions of innocent productive human beings. Castro (an ex-lawyer) has said that he would like to drop a nuclear bomb on New York City. Such mass destruction would prop up his self-esteem by making him feel big and important. All mass- murdering pip-squeaks like this require the tools of altruism to rationalise their purposeful destruction of values and life.

Government control always means the control of individuals by force. Communism, fascism, socialism and democracy are all political systems that survive by force. Democracy is less destructive than the other three systems, but all four operate on the same concept of external "authority", and unearned power backed by "legalised" force. All four systems use the same existentialist philosophy to obtain a bogus living from productive people.

Democracy is rooted in the uncompetitive principle of authorities with the power to force the will of the majority onto specific individuals. Is man a sovereign individual who owns his own person, his mind, his life, his work and its products - or his he the property of the tribe (the state, the society, the collective) that may dispose of him in any way it pleases, that may dictate his convictions, prescribe the course of his life, control his work and expropriate his products? Does man have the right to exist for his own sake - or is he born in bondage, as an indentured servant who must keep buying his life by serving the tribe but can never acquire it free and clear.

"No government has ever helped an individual produce more values or achieve greater happiness than he could have produced without a government."

Governments differ only in the degree to which they harm people. In fact no valid reason for a government exists except for protecting individual rights.

Politicians desperately want to prove to themselves and to the world that they are important. They do not earn legitimate self-esteem through building values, but they inherit a big shot of prestige if they get elected.

Driven by re-election fever, politicians generate more and more laws to gain recognition and popularity. All those laws create more and more taxes, regulators, lawyers and lawsuits that strangle the progress of business and technology. Existing laws and regulations block industry from investing or putting effort into many vital directions.

"Government is a hoax perpetuated through the centuries through force, out of context statements and manipulations"

The most oppressive, unhappy period of history was the Dark Ages during which religious power controlled the political system and used unlimited force against individuals. The government and church always oppressed women more than men. Historically the male politicians and theologians always found physically weaker and more emotionally dependant women their first and easiest target to bully into submission.

In exercising this unearned power, professional parasites gained more leverage by encouraging the men to bully the physically weaker women into submission.

By contrast, human happiness and well-being increase during periods of reduced government and religious power. Now for the first time in history with the rise of free market economies, women have become more productive, more independent, thus less oppressed.

The Hidden Criminals

Two classes of criminal exist:

(1) People, who with blatant criminal minds, openly rob, injure and murder human beings. These sub-humans are usually scorned by society and are jailed through objective law and valid justice.

(2) The most dangerous class consists of people with ingeniously criminal minds who covertly rob, injure, destroy entire economies, entire populations, entire nations, entire civilisations. These camouflaged criminals survive by destructive deceptions that are used to gain bogus livelihoods, respect and even adulation from their conned human victims. These criminals are usually praised by the parasitical "Establishment" and are not held responsible for their crimes.

The normal class of criminal sporadically commits crimes against various individuals.

The second class of criminal continuously commits crimes against everyone and society through his destructive career. These hidden criminals are responsible for all wars, slave master relationships, mass thefts, purposeful destruction, terrorism and genocide. These criminal minds control the productive human beings, by using hidden agendas and fostering guilt. This has been happening for 3000 years.

Those compassion hoaxers do not function through benevolence and good will. They function through parasitical force and malevolent destruction. Be they politicians, journalists, judges, professors, advocates, they all feign good intentions to conceal agendas of unearned livelihoods, power and esteem. How can you trust anyone who must implore his victim to "trust" him. How good are the intentions of politicians, news journalists, judges, or clergy who must constantly try to convince themselves and others of their good intentions and compassion, especially toward their ultimate victims, such as minorities, the poor, the disadvantaged, innocent animals and the environment.

By contrast the genuine, honest, trustworthy and good-intentioned person doesn’t need to prove that he or she is honest, trustworthy, good-intentioned and compassionate. In fact these type of individuals are seldom aware of having these qualities. Who really provides for the needs of everyone at ever lower costs? Not the people who try to convince themselves and others how much care and compassion they have for the disadvantaged, animals, and the environment.

Essentially the value destroyer is consumed with guilt over his or her self-made destructive nature. Each lives by what the other thinks rather than face up to the facts of reality. Thus, each of them squirms behind facades of good intentions and feigned compassion. Within each hoaxer there exists an agenda to vilify, drain and destroy value-and-job producers from the biggest manufacture’s to the smallest.

These professional parasites are clever, scheming people with well camouflaged minds. They steal physical and psychological livings from the producers without anyone realising the thefts. By orchestrating deceptive illusions they attack, undermine and lay guilt on innocent producers by making the good seem bad and the bad seem good. The innocent appear guilty and the guilty appear innocent.

All governments and religions work to break human beings of their natural self-confidence, creativity, happiness, pride, courage and honesty. They are responsible for subtle, undetected destruction, suffering and killings far beyond all the bloodiest wars combined: wars which are also staged by them.

With hypocritical concern and dishonest speechifying such people can easily, in cold blood, directly kill their own children or indirectly kill thousands or millions of other people’s children. Such is the nature of the beast. Without a backward glance at their wreckage they will commit any destruction they can get away with, in order to keep or increase their unearned power. Honesty means absolutely nothing to them. They abandoned integrity, rationality and competitive effort long ago. Yet they succeed by creating illusions that they care about life. That they protect, help, or save the lives of others.

Big government and its career politicians, if not removed, will kill the productive middle class.. The job creators, the aggressive entrepreneurs, have been shut down by big government. Now big- government regulation and legislation is all firmly in place to prevent new aggressive entrepreneurs from rising. As a result, the middle class is dying. This scenario is happening across Europe and America. Like cancer, big government needs to be cut out.